Re: VLT time for period 72

From: Mamoru Doi (doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 01:05:42 PDT

  • Next message: clidman: "Re: VLT time for period 72"

    Hi Chris,

    I am sorry for my long silence.

    I think 2002ks should be 2002kt if SuF information
    on your HP is correct.
     SuF02-019 SN2002kt 0.505
     SuF02-082 SN2002kx 0.623

    When do you have to make the final decision?

    Our proposal to request the final references (3hours exposure
    time in four SXDS fields) with Suprime-Cam is now being reviewed.
    We will know the result in early August.

    Cheers,

    -Mamoru

    > We have an additional 10 hours of FORS2/VLT during period 72 to take
    >final reference
    >images of the Fall 2002 Subaru SNe that were imaged with the VLT. Last year
    >we imaged
    >2002ks and 2002kt with the VLT. See
    >
    >http://www.sc.eso.org/~clidman/FILE_LISTING_169.A-0382E
    >
    > I plan to spend about 2 hours on each SNe. This will leave us with a bit
    >of time to take
    >reference images on older SNe. Suggestions are welcome.
    >
    >Cheers, Chris.
    >
    >

    Mamoru Doi
    Institute of Astronomy
    School of Science
    University of Tokyo
    voice +81-422-34-5084
    fax. +81-422-34-5041
    doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 01:05:56 PDT