From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:21:00 PST
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:17:40PM -0800, Lifan Wang wrote:
> For self-consistency, it would be nice to correct everything to
> CMB. Otherwise there will be a small systematic error.
Have you done the corrections for the distant SNe? If so, send them to
me, and that makes it all very easy. (This would include the HST SNe.)
We're only using redshfits to two decimal places. These differences are
going to be *tiny* compared to the photometry error in any event, and I
suspect that any systematic error would be indistinguishable from pretty
much anything else you could name. (E.g. the finite resolution of a
laser printer.)
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:21:13 PST