stdin: I've added a few more candidates to the list so we have more bright ones...

I've added a few more candidates to the list so we have more bright ones
to look at. Unfortunately, this is because the weather isn't behaving
well -- poor seeing (~1") and clouds going by overhead.

Name	position angle	complete	scheduled	galaxy z or [SN z]	SN?	Field #	RA(2000)	Dec(2000)	Priori	Mag.	Ap .sig	%INC
SuF02-001/ -027		K	--	0.57	matches z	1, 5	02:17:00.2	-04:58:21.2	5	23.18	42.11	86
SuF02-055		K	--	0.66	matches z	2	02:18:53.2	-04:33:00.0	5	23.41	40.61	660
SuF02-071		K	--	0.928	matches z	1, 5	02:17:08.7	-05:02:07.0	5	23.92	32.54	582
SuF02-056			G?			4	02:20:00.0	-04:44:20.7	5	24.06	19.06	95
SuF02-002		V	--	0.82	consistent	1	02:17:12.3	-04:55:09.5	5	24.14	17.39	54
SuF02-021		K				2			4	24.28	20.26	50
SuF02-025		V	--	0.606	matches z	5	02:16:23.9	-04:49:30.5	5	24.31	18.33	89
SuF02-037		K	-	0.926	matches z	2	02:17:43.3	-04:30:57.2	4	24.39	18.20	27
SuF02-060		V G	--	1.063	matches z	1	02:17:34.5	-04:53:47.0	4	24.46	16.98	25
SuF02-061			K?			3			4	24.55	16.36	105
SuF02-005		V	--	0.86	not clear	2	02:18:35.7	-04:31:11.0	4	24.57	10.76	16
SuF02-073 *		G (?alex)	--		flat?	5	02:16:27.5	-05:04:36.6	4	24.58	16.13	20
SuF02-019		K z ~ 0.7	--	0.505	consistent	1	02:17:38.1	-05:08:47.0	4	24.59	15.13	35
SuF02-017	PA	K G	- (more?)	[1.0]	SN z	5	02:16:45.7	-05:09:51.5	5	24.61	12.15	1782
SuF02-000	+80	Kz~1, 1.5	--	0.92	consistent	1	02:17:42.6	-05:06:34.4	5	24.68	9.65	22
SuF02-028	-58	V	--	0.347	not clear	1, 5	02:16:56.4	-05:00:57.5	5	24.71	14.03	35
SuF02-077			bright host			2			4	24.72	13.35	10
SuF02-004			AGN core?			1			3	24.75	12.19	32
SuF02-065	-45	V	--	1.18	matches z	1	02:17:34.5	-05:00:15.6	5	24.80	12.55	34
SuF02-054			bright host			1			4	24.81	11.39	16
SuF02-026[***]		K V	--	1.46 AGN?	not clear	1, 2, 4	02:18:51.9	-04:46:57.3	5	24.83	11.26	28
SuF02-082		K z ~ 0.6		0.623	matches?	1	02:18:40.7	-05:03:44.9	5	25.03	12.67	15
SuF02-083	0 (+45)	V	--	1.272	not seen	1	02:18:06.2	-05:00:38.8	5	25.10	6.08	19
SuF02-007 / -074	PA	V	(more?) VK	[1.2,1.17, 0.89] ???	SN z	1, 4	02:18:52.4	-05:01:14.0	5	25.1/24.7	5.86	25880
SuF02-081 **		NO HST	VVV			4	02:20:07.5	-05:08:27.5	4	25.14	7.92	69
J01		G	--		flat&blu?	2	02:17:45.97	-04:36:46.1		25.14		107
SuF02-012[***]		K VVV	--(done?)	[1.3,1.5]	SN z	1, 2, 4	02:18:51.6	-04:47:25.7	4	25.17	5.85	118
SuF02-057 **		NO HST	(V)			4	02:20:13.9	-05:07:36.2	5	25.24	7.21	306
SuF02-051	PA	V	not enough K? but flat			2	02:17:27.5	-04:40:45.2	5	25.27	8.29	10952
SuF02-059	90/PA	K	not enough			4	02:20:28.0	-04:58:50.8	5	25.39	5.77	83
SuF02-034	+7					1	02:18:31.2	-05:01:24.5	4	25.76	4.81	16
SuF02-076 *	PA					5	02:16:26.4	-05:04:32.4	5	25.83	5.06	398
SuF02-086	PA					1	02:17:16.2	-05:06:02.7	5	26.19	5.02	181

Photo-z is listed in "completed" column as, for example, "z ~ 0.7" If we have a real spectroscopic redshift estimate it is listed in the “galaxy z or [SN z]” column. In the “complete” and “scheduled” columns G=Gemini; V=VLT; K=Keck.

[Info we thought we had from photo-z codes indicating, for 034, z ~1.5,1.8 and elliptical and burst?? from Hyper z code went away, because they had the wrong host galaxy.

maybe add SuF02-004, but this is probably a late supernova with light on ref, and brighter than reported on the tiles printout AND NO HST guide star.

*= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a *

**= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a **

[***]= could be observed in the same ACS image (same FOCAS/Gemini slit?) with the other candidate marked with a [***]

1 has 15 candidates (10 are fainter than 24.6) with priorities 4 and 5

2 6 (3)

3 0 (0)

4 7 (6)

5 7 (3)

_____ = particularly likely for tonight

_____ = no host candidate

_____ = not much host

_--__ = do not get spectroscopy: either this has already been observed, or there is no HST guide star, or the photo-z is low.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 11 2002 - 00:29:42 PST