From: Lifan Wang (lifan@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Sun Nov 10 2002 - 21:39:13 PST
Mamoru,
On Keck spectrum, it seems the 9178 A is resolved into a doublet
with split being consistent with [O II] identification.
Lifan
> From owner-deepnews@listserv.lbl.gov Sun Nov 10 20:51:04 2002
> X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.lbl.gov: majordom set sender to owner-deepnews@listserv.lbl.gov using -f
> X-Sender: doi@mail.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
> Reply-To: doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J
> To: deepnews@lbl.gov
> Subject: Re: Lifan thinks we see the other NeV line for 026, implying
> it's an AGN
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Sender: owner-deepnews@lbl.gov
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't see NeV3426 at ~8430A on VLT spectrum.
> Plobably in the Keck spectrum?
>
> Though I understand that this is not
> a straight explanation, but how about the
> following combinations?
>
> 9179 Hbeta(4863-4853)
> 8263 Hgamma(4342-4346)
> at z=0.90
>
> The latter wavelengths are from SDSS composite QSO
> spectra (D.Vanden Berk et al. AJ, 122, 549-564, 2001)
> I got this idea from Fig.6 of this paper
> when I tried to fit those two lines with
> SiIV and CIV (at z=4.92).
>
> The lines are not broad very much,
> but the line at 9179 seems to me slightly
> larger than velocity rotation/dispersion
> of usual galaxies. There might be weak
> broad-line components in this galaxy.
>
> The both photo-z codes give z=0.8 for this galaxy.
>
> Do we see [OIII] at 9510? Mmm...
>
> -Mamoru
>
> >Lifan thinks we see the other NeV line (restframe 3426 A) for 026,
> >implying it is, in fact, an AGN, as we were suspecting. This also fits
> >the fact that it is too bright for its redshift (z = 1.46) if were a
> >normal SN Ia.
>
>
>
> Mamoru Doi
> Institute of Astronomy
> School of Science
> University of Tokyo
> voice +81-422-34-5084
> fax. +81-422-34-5041
> doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 10 2002 - 21:39:25 PST