Re: Upgrades for SNe

From: Gerson Goldhaber (g_goldhaber@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 17:35:02 PST

Next message: Mamoru Doi: "Re: Gemini tonight"

Previous message: Alex Kim: "Re: Upgrades for SNe"
In reply to: Alex Kim: "Re: Upgrades for SNe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Alex,
I am sorry I missed your comments on candidates 063 and 079.
I have looked at them carefully again. I would not go as far as to say
they are crap, however they are certainly a long shot. I would say they
should be considered last on any spectroscopic followup. We will get
photometric follow up in any case. As we do not have a priority 3.5 , I
will down grade them back to 3.
thanks for your comments. Gerson

Next message: Mamoru Doi: "Re: Gemini tonight"
Previous message: Alex Kim: "Re: Upgrades for SNe"
In reply to: Alex Kim: "Re: Upgrades for SNe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 17:35:16 PST