From: Gerson Goldhaber (g_goldhaber@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 16:07:27 PST
Hi all
I have taken another look at the priority 3 candidates.
Here are the results in order of increasing magnitude:
name upgrade
021 3 to 4 cand on large galaxy
061 3 to 4 definite object but
AGN/variable star ?
079 3 to 4 Cand on Medium Galaxy
080 3 to 4 Cand on large Galaxy
077 3 to 4 " " " "
050 3 to 4 " " medium "
063 3 to 4 " " small "
004 3 to 4 cand on small galaxy
068 3 to 4 AGN/variable star ?
025 downgrade 5 to 4 Alex is suspicious of the reference, I
would still keep as 4
053 014 075 070 078 018 I would still leave as priority 3.
The common thread of the upgrades is that a clear cut galaxy was
involved in each case,except for 2 possible
AGN's . I have implemented these changes on sntrak.
So there is more to look at! cheers
Gerson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 16:07:42 PST