Re: A two hour swap between FORS2 and FORS1 has been approved

From: Pierre Astier (pierre.astier@in2p3.fr)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 18:54:28 PDT

  • Next message: clidman@eso.org: "VLT"

    On Wed, 15 May 2002 clidman@eso.org wrote:

    > Hi Pierre,
    > In which sense is the mistake. Should I try this or not?

    It is not a leftover from April. I discussed with Saul just 2 mn ago
    and we agreed on the fact that Isntix should be done if possible.

    sorry for being unclear

    Good luck

    Pierre.

    >
    > Cheers, Chris.
    >
    > Pierre Astier wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
    > >
    > > > > I finally managed to get an extra two hours on FORS1. With the 50 minutes in hand, this
    > > > > will enable us to try two candidates. I propose:
    > > > >
    > > > > T02-059/Boromir 3600 seconds
    > > > > C02-013/Isntix 3600 seconds
    > > >
    > > > Is C02-013 left over from April? I'm not familiar with that one; the
    > > > information in SNTrak suggests that it might even have started in March.
    > >
    > > This is a mistake. check
    > > http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/~sne/AllNews/candidats/Isntix.ps
    > > where date 0 of the lightcurve is April 12th.
    > >
    > > >
    > > > I think T02-059 is one of the most (if not *the* most) probable "deep"
    > > > candidates at this point.
    > > >
    > > > -Rob
    > > >
    > >
    > > --
    > >
    > > -------------------
    > > Pierre Astier , LPNHE, 4 place Jussieu F 75252 Paris Cedex 05
    > > tel (33) 1 44 27 48 42 ---- fax (33) 1 44 27 46 38
    > 

    -- 

                      -------------------
Pierre Astier , LPNHE, 4 place Jussieu F 75252 Paris Cedex 05
tel (33) 1 44 27 48 42 ---- fax (33) 1 44 27 46 38

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 14 2002 - 18:55:47 PDT