SDF and SDFw comparison by Naoki

From: Mamoru Doi (doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Date: Fri May 10 2002 - 06:22:23 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: SDF and SDFw comparison by Naoki"

    Hi,

    Naoki finished analysis in SDF and in SDFw.
    Below are the list of SN candidates　he got.

    SDF
       rank RA Dec i'
    SDF1 C 13:23:40.30 +27:13:57.2 24.99
    SDF2 D 13:24:40.80 +27:22:15.5 24.32
    SDF3 D 13:24:41.50 +27:24:56.7 23.75
    SDF4 C 13:24:39.37 +27:33:17.8 23.83
    SDF5 B 13:24:25.92 +27:44:33.9 23.74

    SDFw
         rank RA Dec i' SNTrak i'_LBL
    SDFw1 B 13:23:02.59 +27:14:14.3 24.47 # S02-057 24.96
    SDFw2 C 13:21:54.35 +27:21:11.7 25.38
    SDFw3 A 13:22:12.81 +27:20:07.6 25.65 # S02-060 25.79
    SDFw4 A 13:23:11.70 +27:32:13.3 25.14
    SDFw5 A 13:23:37.03 +27:29:41.0 25.18 # S02-061 26.03
    SDFw6 C 13:22:51.19 +27:35:14.9 25.34
    SDFw7 C 13:22:22.65 +27:45:13.7 24.91
    SDFw8 B 13:22:43.66 +27:45:08.8 25.38
    SDFw9 C 13:23:37.32 +27:45:04.8 22.96 # S02-058 23.34

    Names are just for temporary use.
    The magnitudes are for increased flux and the band
    system is all i' band. We got slightly brighter magnitudes
    for SNe as those by LBL.

    The first column of the list shows our ranks.
    A: very good target
    B: good target
    C: backup target
    D: backup but in the lowest rank

    As we already reported, SDF was not as deep as
    in SDFw. We don't have any "A" candidates in SDF while we found
    three "A" candidates in SDFw.

    Naoki is sending small(1arcminx1arcmin) fits files of
    SNe in the SDF and short exposure (15sec) images to LBL.
    (We got the final approval from the director.)

    -Mamoru and Naoki

      

    Mamoru Doi
    Institute of Astronomy
    School of Science
    Univ. of Tokyo
    voice +81-422-34-5084
    fax. +81-422-34-5041
    doi@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 10 2002 - 06:22:27 PDT