1999ac paper - wavelength errors

From: Greg Aldering (aldering@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2004 - 13:35:15 PST

  • Next message: Gabriele Garavini: "Re: 1999ac paper - wavelength errors"

    Hi Gabriele,

    We have noticed that there are wavelength errors in the spectra of 99ac.
    In particular, the blue and red spectra a +11 days, and the red spectrum
    at +16 days have very significant shifts. This was noticed because the
    telluric features didn't line up (and would have been discovered had
    a telluric correction been performed).

    Below I list the spectra and the locations of the minimum of the
    (deredshifted) telluric A-band. Due to resolution effects, the
    minima can shift around a little (which is why correcting for
    telluric features with standard stars with the same setup is
    important), however, all the large shifts are in spectra with good
    resolution so the offsets are real (I confirmed them by eye as well).

    mw.sn99ac.CTIO4m.990329.r.16.dat 7532 <---- large offset
    mw.sn99ac.APO3_5m.990226.r.-15.dat 7534 possibly due to low res
    mw.sn99ac.CTIO4m.990315.b.2.dat 7536
    mw.sn99ac.CTIO4m.990321.b.8.dat 7537
    mw.sn99ac.ESO.990415.r.33.dat 7538
    mw.sn99ac.ESO3_6m.990421.r.39.dat 7538
    mw.sn99ac.KPNO4m.990406.b.24.dat 7538
    mw.sn99ac.MDM2_4m.990304.b.-9.dat 7538
    mw.sn99ac.ESO3_6m.990410.r.28.dat 7539
    mw.sn99ac.NOT.990315.r.2.dat 7539
    mw.sn99ac.CTIO4m.990329.b.16.dat 7540
    mw.sn99ac.Lick.990424.r.42.dat 7540
    mw.sn99ac.NOT.990315.b.2.dat 7540
    mw.sn99ac.LICK3m.990413.r.31.dat 7543
    mw.sn99ac.CTIO4m.990324.b.11.dat 7548 <---- large offset
    mw.sn99ac.CTIO4m.990324.r.11.dat 7549 <---- large offset

    Note that these offsets will affect your line velocity measurements,
    as presented in the manuscript. This may also affect some of Gaston's
    measurements.

    Since the largest offsets all come from CTIO, where I was a observer,
    perhaps I can comment. I only take arcs at the start and end of the
    night, and so if there is flexure or some other small changes (like
    changing a slit or cycling between gratings) this has to be corrected
    using the night sky lines and then refined in the process of correcting
    the telluric lines. In these cases, in my logs I note that I used
    wider slits for 99ac on 990324 and 990329 because of large image motion
    (the slit width is in the data header). So, there could be wavelength
    shifts due the change of the slit, and also if the SN was not perfectly
    centered in these wider slits. Only telluric features can detect the
    later situation.

    I recommend that a) all the wavelength zeropoints be checked using
    night sky lines, and b) that telluric corrections be performed and
    the spectra adjusted in wavelength if needed to align the telluric
    features. Only then can the velocity measurements be trusted. You
    should also check to see whether 99aa is affected.

    Cheers,

    Greg



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 17 2004 - 13:35:18 PST