LBL Cosmology Visitor Program Weak Lensing workshop Day 2 discussions * Monday, Aug. 9, morning discussions will focus on using weak lensing for cluster finding, and for mapping cluster profiles. The afternoon will either continue this or concentrate on space/ground issues. * The community benchmark tests of shear extraction by various groups on the same catalogs - STEPS? - could take a first step at the LBL workshop with the participants next week serving to prototype the comparison. Will space data be available? * More discussion of the importance of source redshift distribution, and the relative slowness of the z^2 e^{-z^1.2} drop off. The z>3 sources make a significant contribution in this case. What are the effects for space/ground? This led to a discussion of whether z_median was actually an appropriate measure to use in comparing surveys. Henk pointed out that even just z_mean would be superior. Generally the results could be very sensitive to z so we need better estimators of the source redshift distribution. As a practical concern in simulations, where should the data outputs start? One might likely need to begin dumps at z=5. * sigma8 seems to agree within 1-2sigma from the different WL experiments, but this is still far from the 1% precision desired. * Rule of thumb of the day [Henk]: "If you can measure photo-z's, you can measure shapes". * Again, how to use multiband information? At the least, multiple bands give effectively increased exposure time, and one would presumably weight the shapes from each filter by S/N. But what added value do multiple filters bring for shape determination? Are there pros/cons for systematics? * Observations - when will it be practical to have sufficiently good observations to achieve 1) tomography, 2) CCC/offset-linear method. Henk says VLT gets an effective number density of galaxies of 15/min^2. Once you divide this into bins, you get killed as n^2, which you have to make up with a very large area, but systematics will limit this at some point. * Some discussion of photo-z's and training sets vs. templates.